See the signal others miss.
For translational oncology groups working with paediatric, early-stage and low-input samples. Detect parts-per-million variants your current platform calls negative, with a fully open pipeline, raw data, and the choice to send samples or run SiMSen-Seq in-house.
Send samples vs run SiMSen-Seq in-house.
Same chemistry, same sensitivity, same data quality. What changes is who runs the bench and where the workflow lives. Here is the honest comparison.
| What changes | Send samples (full-service lab) | Run in-house (LabSuite) |
| Best when | You want turnaround and interpretation handled, or run occasional batches. | You have bench capacity and want full control, or run steady volume. |
| Who runs the bench | Our ISO 15189-compliant lab in Sweden. | Your team, on instruments you already own. |
| Instruments | None needed on your side. | Instrument-agnostic; validated on common Illumina platforms. |
| Turnaround | Defined service turnaround, no setup time. | Set by your own scheduling once established. |
Not sure which fits?
Most groups start with one and add the other. Tell us your sample types and volumes and we will recommend a starting point.
See the delivery detail
The full breakdown of both delivery models, with the trade-offs on cost, control, turnaround and capability.
Go deeper, or switch to another audience.
SiMSen-Seq, the science under the hood.
Barcoded duplex sequencing, error suppression and the sample-to-result workflow, with performance data.
Publications and disease-area pages.
Peer-reviewed performance data and the paediatric solid tumours pillar behind the low-AF claims.
Clinical trials, or clinics.
The same five pillars retold for pharma and CRO trial teams and for private oncology clinics.
Tell us about your samples.
A real human, in CET/CEST time zone, who has run paediatric and low-input samples like yours.